What’s hot and what’s not in media land? Fashions ebb and flow. Mental health stories come in and out of the spotlight. Recently, the supposed psychiatrist vs psychologist war has been stoked. This past week, we’ve had various pundits rehashing the old, old story that mental illness doesn’t really exist. Today, it was the turn of Giles Fraser to spin this line, having made the same case on BBC Radio 4’s debate show the Moral Maze.
Fr Giles has had what I hope will turn out to be an education by twitter’s expert’s by experience and experts by profession. I’ve been commenting on twitter today. Various writers have put it far better than I could, so I’ll let their words speak for me by picking what I consider to be three of the best rebuttals:
-
Depression, Anti-Psychiatry and Christianity
by Los The Skald – This is endorsed by Giles Fraser himself as a “good piece” and is the only one (so far) that he’s retweeted. It provides context to Fr Giles’s comments by taking a long view of the history and perception of mental illness. The logic still holds even if you skip the textual comparisons of passages of the Bible in the middle of the article.
-
The continuity concept: your sadness is not my depression
by Charlotte Walker – A withering rebuttal by eloquent expert by experience Charlotte, fueled by cold anger which demolishes Giles Fraser’s woolly logic step by step.
-
Depression is not the same as ‘being sad’, Giles Fraser
(New Statesman) by Glosswitch
Many others have written excellent pieces and all the relevant links I’ve come across are also linked below. Enjoy.
.
.
..
.
.
.
Mainstream media (pill shaming):
-
Psychiatrists: the drug pushers
Guardian newspaper– Will Self – “Is the current epidemic of depression and hyperactivity the result of disease-mongering by the psychiatric profession and big pharma? Does psychiatry have any credibility left at all?” (3rd August)
-
The Moral Maze – The Pursuit of Happiness
BBC Radio 4 – “As a nation we have a reputation for being phlegmatic, stiff upper-lipped types. The reality, it seems, could hardly be further from that caricature. When it comes to anxiety and depression, we’re a nation of pill poppers.” Debate chaired by Michael Buerk with Claire Fox, Anne McElvoy, Kenan Malik and Giles Fraser, and witnesses David Pearce (World Transhumanist Association / Humanity Plus), Alison Murdoch (Foundation for Developing Compassion and Wisdom) Oliver James (clinical psychologist and author) and Mark Williamson (Action for Happiness) (7th August)
-
Taking pills for unhappiness reinforces the idea that being sad is not human
Guardian newspaper – Giles Fraser – “If you have a terrible job or home life, being unhappy is hardly inappropriate. Pathologising it can only make everything worse.” (9th August) (twitter: @giles_fraser)
.
Rebuttals – mainstream media:
-
Letters – Psychiatry, drugs and the future of mental healthcare
Guardian newspaper (rebuttals to the Will Self piece) (7th August)
-
Depression is not the same as “being sad”, Giles Fraser
New Statesman – Glosswitch (twitter: @glosswitch) – “Casual “let’s not pathologise sadness” musings don’t contribute much to the debate about medication for depression. I’m writing this post to dispel a few myths about depression and the use of medication. I should mention, however, that I’m none of the following: psychiatrist, psychologist, pharmacist, biologist, philosopher, renowned expert in happiness and the inner workings of every human soul. That said, neither is Giles Fraser, the Guardian’s Loose Canon, but he hasn’t let that stop him.” (10th August)
-
Depression is more than simple unhappiness
Guardian newspaper – Margaret McCartney (twitter: @mgtmccartney) – “Antidepressants may be overprescribed, but as a GP I know the solution is not to minimise the experience of this condition.” (12th August)
-
We don’t know if antidepressants work, so stop bashing them
Guardian newspaper, Science – Pete Etchells (twitter: @petetchells) – “It’s a difficult debate, because it is so often emotionally charged on both sides. The best thing that we can do is to look at the data for answers.” (15th August) – An examination of scientific studies into anti-depressant use, including the 2 main ones that say they do and do not work.
.
Rebuttals – blogosphere:
- My tweets (Storify)
- Pill shaming, Giles Fraser & happy pills (10th August)
- Giles Fraser, scare stats and antidepressants (update on 12th August)
-
Doctor, Doctor… Pt 2
Tania Browne blog (twitter: @CherryMakes) –“I read an article today that shows the stigma of mental health that hinders people seeking help isn’t going to go away any time soon. Speaking in The Guardian’s Comment section, Giles Fraser suggested that we may be too happy just to pop to the doc and get some jolly old pills to cheer us up when sadness is a very normal side of the human condition.” (10th August)
-
For Giles Fraser, ignorance truly is bliss
The Dirty Ho blog (twitter: @the_dirty_ho) – “In his recent article Giles Fraser allows a valid underlying point to be undermined by his profound lack of understanding of depression.”) (10th August)
-
In the interests of clarity, Giles Fraser should exercise the right to reply
The Dirty Ho blog (twitter: @the_dirty_ho) (11th August)
-
Response to Giles Fraser’s Latest Article on Depression
Elliot Hollingsworth blog (twitter: @ElliotHollings) – “I have a lot of time for Giles Fraser. However his latest article in the Guardian’s Comment is Free seems fairly lax on the facts and also on the difference between normal sadness and the mental illness, depression.” (10th August)
-
Giles Fraser and mental health: When the Church fails at being a church, when the spiritual let down spirituality
by Heathen Hub blog (twitter: @gurdur) (10th August)
-
Common Misconceptions About Depression
A Hot Bath Won’t Cure It blog (twitter: @chloemiriam) -– BINGO! – “In rebuttal to Giles Fraser’s poorly argued piece on anti depressants and ADHD medication, which may have hit ‘common misconceptions about depression BINGO!” I am inspired to reply in a somewhat tired and mixed up manner.” (10th August)
-
Dear Giles Fraser, Depression and Unhappiness are NOT the Same
Gibbs Gubbins blog (twitter: @msjenmac) (10th August)
-
Depression, Anti-Psychiatry and Christianity
Los the Skald blog (twitter: @lostheskald) – “In his Guardian column today, Fr. Giles Fraser presents an argument which, has, in various guises, been with us since at least the 1960s: that mental illness, and specifically depression, is the ‘pathologisation of sadness’, and that biochemical treatments for depression are an example of ‘the scientists [being] called in to reinforce generally conservative norms of appropriate behaviour’. This post responds to his article by assessing the ‘anti-psychiatry’ tradition within which it falls, discussing some differences between sadness and depression, examining this difference in the Old Testament, and suggesting a Christian response to mental illness based on the stories of healings and exorcisms performed by Jesus in the Gospels.” (10th August)
-
The Continuum Concept – why your sadness is not my depression
Mental Health Cop (twitter: @MentalHealthCop) – “I recently read the piece you are about to read – a service user’s reaction to a recent media piece – and was totally blown away …” Reblogged piece, plus introduction (11th August)
-
My “peculiar reaction” to Giles Fraser’s thoughts on anti-depressants
Nurture My Baby blog (twitter: @nurturemybaby) (10th August)
-
The continuum concept: why your sadness is not my depression
Purple Pursuasion blog (twitter: @bipolar blogger) – “Modern medicine is widely held to be A Good Thing. It is allowing us to live longer, healthier lives than at any other point in human history. The media loves the story of a scientific breakthrough and the promise of yet more astounding treatments in years to come, whether through improved surgical techniques, gene therapy or new, more effective drug treatments.Unless, that is, we’re talking about the modern medicine of psychiatry. Suddenly, the ground shifts and medication is viewed with suspicion, even disgust. Antidepressants become “happy pills”; using drugs as directed by a doctor is described as being “hooked” or “addicted.” (10th August)
-
Depression is not Being a Bit Sad
A Reflex Anglican blog by Eileen Fitzroy Russell (9th August)
-
Sadness and Depression – NOT the same thing
Ruby Wax‘s website (12th August)
-
Plaster of paris on a broken leg reinforces the idea that having a broken limb is not human
Ruth Stirton blog (twitter: @RuthStirton) – “Giles Fraser misses the point. His entire comment is premised on the idea that being sad, and having clinical depression are on the same spectrum. Of course clinical depression can be solved with diet and exercise, because we all know that those things make us feel better if we’re having a sad day. No. Wrong. Clinical depression is a different thing entirely.” (10th August)
-
Forgive him father, for he knows not what he does
The Dirty Ho blog (twitter: @thedirtyho) (14th August)
.
Older pieces – mainstream media:
-
Britain – the Prozac Nation? Not So Fast
Discover Magazine – by Neuroskeptic (twitter: @neuro_skeptic) – “The media coverage has been predictable with lots of scary, context-free statistics, and boilerplate quotes from the usual suspects. No doubt tomorrow we’ll see a selection of moralistic op-eds about this. But not one of the many nigh-identical articles provided a link to the original data, or even a useful description of where one might find it. After contacting one of the NHS organizations named as the source, I managed to track the numbers down.” (December 2011)
-
The War on Unhappiness: Goodbye Freud, Hello Positive Thinking
Harpers Magazine -by Gary Greenberg (September 2010)
-
On the Medicalization of Our Culture
Harvard Magazine (April 2009)
.
Older pieces – blogosphere:
-
These Guardian / Independent stories are dodgy. Traps in data journalism
Bad Science blog by Ben Goldacre – “Here’s an interesting problem with data analysis in general, and so, by extension, data journalism: you have to be careful about assuming that the numbers you’ve got access to… really do reflect the underlying phenomena you’re trying to investigate.” (December 2011)
-
Happy Pills
International Bipolar Foundation by Charlotte Walker (twitter: @bipolarblogger) (April 2013)
-
i wanted to die
Fragmentz blog (twitter: @fragmentz) – A personal experience of depression (November 2011)
-
It’s World Mental Health Day, so stop stigmatising my pills
The F Word blog (twitter: @incurablehippie)by Philippa Willitts (October 2011)
-
Don’t manufacture my meaning: a response to Darian Leader
Purple Persuasion blog (twitter: @bipolarblogger) on speaking about us without us (29th April)
-
Ten things not to say to a depressed person
Purple Persuasion blog (twitter: @bipolarblogger) (July 2011)
-
Being a mentalist
Put Up With Rain blog – A personal account of experiencing depression (29th May)
.
Additional:
-
Depression
Royal College of Psychiatrists
-
Resources for churches
Time to Change – “We aim to encourage organisations from all sectors and communities to challenge stigma and discrimination. One example of this is work that the Church of England have done to get church congregations talking about mental health. The Revd Eva McIntyre has produced a web resource providing ideas and resources for churches to plan worship on the theme of mental health.”
.
.
…I think it’s not so much the argument of whether or not mental illness “exists”, it’s the framing of it exclusively within biomedical terminology that seems to be the difficulty many people (including myself) seem to have. Distress and despair are real, damaging, terrifying, heartbreaking and dreadful experiences. But why are such things felt only to be “real” if they are allied to genes and chemicals…? marking people as “other” as a result of (unproven) biological differences is the wet-dream of eugenics and it is disturbing to hear such theories propounded as “empowering” and “therapeutic”. Biomedical disregard the human condition and any ideas of free will. It also relieves us of our social responsibilities towards each other, disregarding the importance of challenging and defeating the abuse of all kinds at all levels of society. But none of these arguments amount to the idea that mental distress does not exist, just that we need a different way of talking about it.
Thank you for your comment. There’s a lot to unpack. In essence, though, what you appear to be criticising is – according to several of the rebuttals linked above – a false dichotomy. Take a look and see what you think.